Rebuttal Testimony

Rebuttal testimony in Docket 7032 was filed with the Public Service Board on May 23, 2005. The following links connect to the testimony of parties that have provided their filings electronically. Testimony is posted in the form of PDF files.

• The Department of Public Service filed a letter to the Board indicating it would not be filing rebuttal testimony and explaining the reasons.
  

• Agency of Natural Resources refiled rebuttal testimony
  • Susan K. Bulmer commenting on the direct testimony of DPS witnesses David Raphael and J. Riley Allen, and the Gregg Hill Residents' witnesses William Orr and Frederick Abraham.
• Exhibit ANR Rebuttal SB-1 Agency of Natural Resources Policy on Uses of State Lands
• Diana Frederick commenting on the direct testimony of DPS witness David Raphael and the direct testimony of the Gregg Hill Residents' witnesses William D. Orr and Frederick D. Abraham.
  

• Petitioners prefiled rebuttal testimony
  • Terrence J. Boyle & Adam M. Portz on behalf of VELCO responding to the aesthetic mitigation proposals of DPS and the Gregg Hill Residents.
  • Arthur V. Gilman of William D. Countryman, Environmental Assessment & Planning on behalf of VELCO, addressing the issue of deer wintering yards in the testimony of Mr. Austin of ANR.
  • Hugh H. Henry on behalf of VELCO, discussing the teestmiony of DPS witnesses David Raphael, and the VT Division of Historic Preservation witness, Judith Ehrlich.
  • Ryan C. Johnson on behalf of VELCO, responding to proposals to alter the configuration of pole structures and to right-of-way clearing issues.
  • Bernard Machia on behalf of the Town of Stowe Electric Department responding to testimony filed by the parties on April 11, 2005.
  • Kim S. Moulton on behalf of VELCO responding to suggested changes to the project and addressing the cost implication of the changes.
    

• Stowe Selectboard prefiled rebuttal testimony
  • Ted Teffner, Chair of the Town of Stowe Selectboard, responding to lign design and aesthetic mitigation recommendations offered by David Raphael on behalf of DPS.
    
    
• Gregg Hill Residents prefiled rebuttal testimony
  • William D. Orr, reviewing testimony and responses to interrogatories concerning the proposed Gregg Hill reroute and renewing arguments in favor of the reroute.

DOCKET 7032
CASE SCHEDULE

02.09.05
Public hearing

02.18.05
Deadline for intervention requests

03.10.05
Site visit

03.18.05
Last date for filing discovery requests on petitioners

03.28.05
Last date for petitioners’ prefiled direct testimony and exhibits

04.11.05
All parties other than petitioners prefile direct testimony and exhibits

05.02.05
Last day to serve discovery on April 11 prefiled testimony and exhibits

05.12.05
Last day for discovery responses

05.23.05
All parties prefile rebuttal testimony and exhibits

06.03.05
Last day to serve discovery on rebuttal prefiled testimony and exhibits

06.13.05
Last day for responses to rebuttal discovery

06.27.05
All parties prefile surrebuttal testimony and exhibits

07.06.05
Technical hearing

07.07.05
Technical hearing

07.08.05
Technical hearing

07.18.05 (week of)
Technical hearings

08.08.05
Briefs due

08.22.05
Reply briefs due

10.19.05
Proposal for decision issued

11.04.05
Comments due on proposal for decision

12.07.05
Oral argument on proposal for decision

BOARD SCHEDULING ORDER (PDF)

SCHEDULE CHANGE MEMO OF 04.14.05 (PDF)