LAMOILLE COUNTY TRANSMISSION UPGRADE PROJECT

Information Resources

VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE

01.19.05
Power line debate draws anxious crowd
Concerned residents seek alternate route, more project detail
BY LISA MCCORMACK, STOWE REPORTER

More than 30 Stowe residents voiced concerns and asked questions Monday during a discussion of a proposed $20.3 million power line upgrade that would serve the greater Stowe area.

The meeting was the first in a series of public hearings that will be held with representatives from the town, the Vermont Electric Power Company and the Vermont Department of Public Service as part of the state permitting process for the project.

While most in attendance agreed that a system upgrade is needed to meet the rising demand for electricity in the area, some questioned the current design of the project and asked for additional design details.

Peter Beddow, whose property would be impacted by the new line, said that he wants to know where the poles for the lines would be placed and how tall they would be.

“If we have a 70-foot high pole on a 100-foot right of way and the pole falls, it could fall onto a home,” Beddow said.

Resident Lynn Dougherty said she was not told about the project when she built her home on South Marshall Road two years ago. She has looked at a map of the power line route and fears that if the project moves forward one of the new, higher poles could end up in her living room.

“I needed to get numerous permits from the town and not once was this mentioned,” Dougherty said. “I have five acres. If I had known, I would have moved the location of the house.”

Other residents questioned the dual line, dual pole project design, which calls for the new, 115-kilovolt power line to run alongside the existing 34.5-kilovolt line along the Route 100 corridor from Waterbury to Stowe.

The design plan submitted by VELCO with its permit application in December calls for the existing 34.5 line to be moved within the current right of way and rebuilt at a cost of about $7 million. On Monday, some residents contended that the new 115-kilovolt line would adequately meet the area’s electrical needs and that a second line would be unsightly, unnecessary and unduly expensive.

But VELCO Project Manager Kim Moulton, who attended the meeting, said a second line would be necessary to back up the 115-kilovolt line and to transmit additional electricity to the area in the future as the population grows and the demand on the system increases. Moulton also said the company has surveyed the affected neighborhoods and mapped the placement of the new poles as far away from homes as possible.

The design plan was just one of 12 areas of concern identified in a letter presented to the select board at the meeting by the Stowe Power Line Advisory Committee, a citizen’s group formed last summer to study the project and make recommendations to town officials.

In their letter, committee members said they want VELCO to investigate the feasibility of burying the line or running it through the Waterbury State Forest. They also want the company to investigate other alternatives to running the power line from Waterbury to Stowe, which include extending 115-kilovolt lines in Fairfax and Irasburg to Stowe from the north.

In addition, committee members want VELCO to conduct a study of the aesthetic impact the project would have on Stowe and surrounding communities, and they want the company to prove that there would be no debilitating health effects caused by the project.

Select board members said several of the issues mentioned in the letter had already been addressed and that others would be examined as part of the standard permitting process. Select Board Chairman Dick Marron supports the upgrade, but said town officials must balance the concerns of affected property owners with the electrical needs of the entire town.

“I think that it’s important that the applicant minimize any adverse effect that’s occurring in your neighborhoods to the end that it’s reasonable and it doesn’t place an undue burden on the other rate payers,” Marron said. “We want to keep the lights on in this community.”

Lynn Altadonna, who serves on the planning commission and on the power line advisory committee, recommended that the town narrow its focus to a few key areas of concern to move the project forward as quickly as possible.

“My experience in business life has been that the sooner you get things done, the cheaper the cost,” Altadonna said. “I would hope that Stowe gets this completed as promptly and judiciously as possible.”

Deana Frankel, a representative from the Department of Public Service, attended the meeting to listen to residents’ concerns. She said that her department would review the issues mentioned in the letter and decide which ones should be investigated during the hearing process.

“The more we know what is on people’s minds, the more thorough we can be in the discovery process,” Frankel said.

The next public hearing to discuss the project will be held in Waterbury on Feb. 9, and both representatives from VELCO and the Public Service Department will attend to answer questions. As of press time, a location and time for the meeting had not been determined.


Reprinted with permission of the Stowe Reporter



DOCKET 7032
CASE SCHEDULE

02.09.05
Public hearing

02.18.05
Deadline for intervention requests

03.10.05
Site visit

03.18.05
Last date for filing discovery requests on petitioners

03.28.05
Last date for petitioners’ prefiled direct testimony and exhibits

04.11.05
All parties other than petitioners prefile direct testimony and exhibits

05.02.05
Last day to serve discovery on April 11 prefiled testimony and exhibits

05.12.05
Last day for discovery responses

05.23.05
All parties prefile rebuttal testimony and exhibits

06.03.05
Last day to serve discovery on rebuttal prefiled testimony and exhibits

06.13.05
Last day for responses to rebuttal discovery

06.27.05
All parties prefile surrebuttal testimony and exhibits

07.06.05
Technical hearing

07.07.05
Technical hearing

07.08.05
Technical hearing

07.18.05 (week of)
Technical hearings

08.08.05
Briefs due

08.22.05
Reply briefs due

10.19.05
Proposal for decision issued

11.04.05
Comments due on proposal for decision

12.07.05
Oral argument on proposal for decision


BOARD SCHEDULING ORDER (PDF)

SCHEDULE CHANGE MEMO OF 04.14.05 (PDF)