LAMOILLE COUNTY TRANSMISSION UPGRADE PROJECT

Information Resources

VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE

11.29.04
BY SCOTT MONROE, STOWE REPORTER

As conservation officials moved closer this week to paying for a conservation easement to the Nichols field, town planners who are examining a proposal to run new power lines on 58-foot-high structures through Stowe realized the new route might encroach on the town’s so-called agricultural “gateway.”

The Stowe Land Trust on Monday announced that it had received the $100,000 grant it had applied for from the Vermont Housing and Conservation Board (VHCB) and an additional $43,000 donation from the Freeman Foundation – both will help pay for the total easement price of $291,000. Combined with the $125,000 bond voters approved at Town Meeting, the land trust needs only about $30,000 more for acquisition of the nearly 40-acre open meadow located along Route 100 south of Stowe village.

The proposed power line is part of a $13.4 million power upgrade for Lamoille County that has been requested by local electric utilities to service growth for the next few decades. Potential of taller power lines with a 75 foot right-of-way running on the edge of Nichols field caught town planners off guard and appeared to put that portion of the line at odds with the land trust’s easement.

Stowe’s Planning Commission last Monday asked officials from Vermont Electric Power, the company designing the upgrade, to return for a follow-up meeting on May 3 at 5:30 p.m. so residents who own property on the proposed line’s route could have a chance to examine the plan. Because of an error in mailing notices to the estimated 59 property owners affected by the route, the Planning Commission felt that townspeople should have a second chance to have questions answered.

The new 115 kilovolt power line would primarily follow the existing route of the smaller 34.5 kilovolt line, according to a VELCO spokesperson. However, a topgraphical from the town’s planning department indicates that the proposed line would deviate slightly onto the Nichols’ side of the Little River. Planners are still studying the proposal to determine what changes, if any, electric officials need to make.

“It’s definitely a puzzle right now,” said Tom Jackman, Stowe’s director of planning. “I’m hoping we can work with VELCO and we get a large turnout at the next meeting to look at these issues.”

Jackman said they might ask electric officials to design an alternate route or request that a portion of the line be buried underground, which would cost eight to 10 times as much, according to a VELCO spokesperson.

Heather Furman, executive director of the Stowe Land Trust, said VELCO might reduce the size of the power line poles to minimize the visual impact on the land, particularly toward the Moscow area where the vista of Mount Mansfield stretches over the field. “Obviously, we’re disappointed in the proposal of deviation from the existing right of way,” she said, “but we understand there are energy needs that must be met.”

However, Furman said voters at Town Meeting clearly identified the Nichols field as a site that should be protected from future development.

“People recognize it as Stowe’s front yard,” Furman said of Nichols field. “The state gave us money to protect the agricultural soils...they’re some of the highest quality in the state. Through the easement, those soils are protected forever.”

Life-long resident John Nichols, who sold the development rights to what remains of his family’s farm, said in an interview this week that he would favor the town spending extra money if it meant preserving the field’s scenic attraction.

“I realize going underground is a costly thing, but I don’t know any other alternative other than lowering the poles,” Nichols said.

The land trust’s next step is a capital campaign, seeking local donations and some smaller grants to make up the remaining easement cost. The closing date is July 15 and the land trust hopes to make that deadline.

VELCO hopes to apply for a state permit in June and begin construction of a new power line and new substations in 2006.

Reprinted with permission of the Stowe Reporter




DOCKET 7032
CASE SCHEDULE

02.09.05
Public hearing

02.18.05
Deadline for intervention requests

03.10.05
Site visit

03.18.05
Last date for filing discovery requests on petitioners

03.28.05
Last date for petitioners’ prefiled direct testimony and exhibits

04.11.05
All parties other than petitioners prefile direct testimony and exhibits

05.02.05
Last day to serve discovery on April 11 prefiled testimony and exhibits

05.12.05
Last day for discovery responses

05.23.05
All parties prefile rebuttal testimony and exhibits

06.03.05
Last day to serve discovery on rebuttal prefiled testimony and exhibits

06.13.05
Last day for responses to rebuttal discovery

06.27.05
All parties prefile surrebuttal testimony and exhibits

07.06.05
Technical hearing

07.07.05
Technical hearing

07.08.05
Technical hearing

07.18.05 (week of)
Technical hearings

08.08.05
Briefs due

08.22.05
Reply briefs due

10.19.05
Proposal for decision issued

11.04.05
Comments due on proposal for decision

12.07.05
Oral argument on proposal for decision


BOARD SCHEDULING ORDER (PDF)

SCHEDULE CHANGE MEMO OF 04.14.05 (PDF)